The order of reviewing of articles

The order of reviewing of articles

 

The manuscripts acting in magazine, should have reviews of the doctor of sciences in appropriating branch of sciences (except for articles, individual or which first author is the doctor of sciences) on which the material is published, and doctors-reviewers cannot be members of editorial soviet.
Reviewing is spent confidentially; to the author of reviewed work the possibility is provided to familiarize with the text of the review.
At the negative review the manuscript under the decision of editorial soviet is maybe directed on repeated reviewing.

In case of a deviation of the manuscript the secretary of editorial soviet informs the author a background of refusal or directs a copy of the review. The surname of the reviewer is maybe informed to the author only with the consent of the reviewer.
In case editorial soviet does not divide sights of the author of the published manuscript, it has the right to make about it the interlinear note.
Certified originals of reviews (or their resume) should be stored by signatures of reviewers throughout a year from the date of accommodation of reviewed materials in magazine.
By results of reviewing by edition one of following decisions strikes root:
- about acceptance of article to the publication;
- about acceptance of article to the publication after completion by the author;
- about refusal in the publication.